Quote:
Originally Posted by UmpTTS43
Taking judgement away, it is my opinion that coaches can contribute to an umpires evaluation concerning professionalism and game management. [snip] Coaches can be, and are, tools.
|
Fixed that for you.
And to actually address the subject, I disagree that coaches are all that valuable to the process. Let me try putting it in mathematical terms, what a coach thinks, generally:
Non-obvious calls went mostly against me == you (the umpire) suck
Non-obvious calls went mostly for me == you suck, but less
Remember, we're pretty much the enemy to these guys, like it or not. Because that call you made in the bottom of the first, calling a kid out on a banger at 1B? That
one play was the difference in his team getting beaten 12-1.
I'd like to agree with you that coaches could address professionalism. I'd
like to, but can't. Players and coaches can chirp all game long about anything and everything, but the second an umpire says
anything, he's the bad guy.
Something apparently happened a couple games ago for the Nats, where an umpire said something to Jim Riggleman after the game, and it became a "thing." I heard Ron Dibble - speaking of tools - on TV last night, and he said something like "Well, Jim Riggleman is a consummate professional, so if
he says something about, it's serious." Dibble conveniently doesn't mention anything about how benches gripe all game long.
It's such a one-way street that I really don't want coach input considered. Or, collect all you want, and then take the paper straight to the local recycling company.