View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jun 06, 2010, 12:06pm
BillyMac BillyMac is offline
Esteemed Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 23,313
I Guess That You Had To Be There ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by rsl View Post
... his foot inadvertantly contacts the head of B ... kicked an opponent in the head ... the kick ...
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyMac View Post
Team control foul. Also. A wise man, on this Forum, once said, "Accidental isn't always incidental".
Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref View Post
Yeah, but in this case it really is incidental, isn't it? How is the guy on the floor put at a disadvantage?
The only question in my mind goes back to the orignal post which describes the play as "inadvertant". If I ignore the two references to the contact being a "kick", then this "inadvertant" contact can certainly be ignored as incidental. If the official deemed that there was no intent to harm, or injure, and B simply got up and continued play, then this contact can be ignored.

The two references to this being a "kick" seem to make the case for some type of contact foul being called.

"I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description; and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it" (Justice Potter Stewart, Jacobellis v. Ohio, 1964)
__________________
"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life." (John 3:16)

“I was in prison and you came to visit me.” (Matthew 25:36)
Reply With Quote