View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Thu Apr 01, 2010, 10:29pm
pastordoug pastordoug is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 91
I undearstand completly.... you (mbyron) said quote: "there's no interference without a play to be interfered with" and then turn around and say
quote: "Illegal slide + contact = Interference"

????? Please tell me what I am missing?????

I don't think I said an illegal slide alone is cause to bang someone, but /i did say that the illegal slide which causes contact regardless of whether a play is being made, by FED rules is an out...... Didn't say I would call dask rocks example but just trying figure out what you are saying? Can't be both ways...

Not trying to be agrumentative either. An if in your opinion a guy trying to better himself by studying the rules, asking questions.... well not sure how to respond.

It's the AND/OR of the rule I think that gets either overlooked or again I am reading to far into it... To me AND/OR means just that.... can be both OR just the latter.
Reply With Quote