View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Sun Oct 29, 2000, 05:06pm
BktBallRef BktBallRef is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,616
Exclamation If it does state it, then it isn't so

[/B][/QUOTE]

I agree that it's GT and not BI, my point is that you are reading into the question that the ball isn't above the cylinder where i could (i'm not) read into the question that the ball is above the cylinder. The writer doesn't specify is the ball is directly above(with in the cylinder) the rim or not.
[/B][/QUOTE]

Actually, the exact opposite is true. You can't read into it that the ball is NOT above the cylinder or that it is above the cylinder. You can't read anything into NF exams at all. You have to take it has it's printed. If it doesn't say it's above the cylinder, then it isn't. It's that simple

Start reading things into NF exams and you're doomed for a low score.
Reply With Quote