Quote:
Originally Posted by Jurassic Referee
But in whose eyes is that advantage gained?
The player will invariably feel that the contact affected the play and put him/her at a disadvantage. The official...not so much so.
One side is naturally biased; the other side can't afford to be biased.
That's the flaw in your reasoning imo.
|
in whose eyes is that advantage gained?.....yours...when you're watching a game, be it a soph game, another hs game, small college game, game on tv, etc. i don't care what fanboys, coaches, or players think...this is a chat room of officials...
i think you may be combining the complaints that you hear from fans/players/coaches during games with the opinions of officials (mine, in this case) that are shared in this forum. they are two different things coming from completely different perspectives.
just watch how much contact is allowed to happen that affects the play. it's the reason why the NCAA has instituted the "automatic" fouls last year - contact that causes the ball handler to fall = foul; contact that interrupts RSBQ (rhythm, speed, balance, quickness) = foul.