Thread: Intentional?
View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 16, 2010, 10:35pm
just another ref just another ref is offline
We don't rent pigs
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 7,627
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmhcoachnref View Post
ronny,
as jr pointed out, you have the exact wording in this case play:
4.19.3 situation b: A1 drives to the basket with b1 in pursuit. As a1 begins
the act of shooting, b1 gets a hand on the ball from behind and the subsequent contact takes a1 forcefully to the floor and out of bounds. Ruling: an intentional foul shall be charged when the contact is judged to be excessive, even though the opponent is playing the ball. (4-11)

in your two cases, if, in your opinion, the players committed a foul and you viewed the contact to be excessive, you can charge an intentional foul. You can replace "even though the opponent is playing the ball" with "even though the opponent (offender) is dribbling the ball" or "even though the opponent (offender) is trying to set a screen." the key operative phrase here is "judged to be excessive" even if the play did not otherwise rise to the level of being considered to be intentional.
+1
__________________
I swear, Gus, you'd argue with a possum.
It'd be easier than arguing with you, Woodrow.


Lonesome Dove
Reply With Quote