View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old Tue Feb 16, 2010, 10:26pm
johnnyg08 johnnyg08 is offline
Stop staring at me swan.
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeeBallanfant View Post
Thats my first inclination also, but in last of 9th situation, I might think differently if both runners from 1B and 3B had already touched their next respective bases, which case I would think the game is over and interference ignored.
Why would the B9 be treated any differently from B3 in the situations you are describing?

No run can score if the 3rd out is made at 1B before the B/R reaches 1B.

Rich posted the rule and there are many, many case plays that support the rule.
__________________
It's like Deja Vu all over again
Reply With Quote