View Single Post
  #15 (permalink)  
Old Fri Feb 12, 2010, 10:48am
dash_riprock dash_riprock is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NY
Posts: 1,428
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron View Post
I think the crucial premise of this reasoning is: R3 started the play having legally acquired 3B. Thus, he's not entitled during the play to retreat to 2B, which would constitute running the bases in reverse order.
Unless he is attempting to confuse the defense or make a travesty of the game, his retreat to 2nd is legal.
Reply With Quote