View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Wed Jan 01, 2003, 07:59pm
Nevadaref Nevadaref is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
From the description, I believe that the play met the requirement that the ball be thrown directly into the court, since it seems like it passed over it. But the thrower violated because the pass went untouched by another player. That is the second part of that article and is super important. This is the part that tells us that the violation was by the thrower and thus the next throw-in will take place at the spot where he was.
Reply With Quote