|
Why not call it?
The rule is in the book and has been there MANY years, if not always. What other violations are routinely ignored as often as this one? Violations, as opposed to fouls, should not be judged by advantage. A violation either happened or didn't. The rules don't say that "A player can not stay in the lane more than 3 seconds IF BY DOING SO THEY GAIN AN ADVANTAGE." Would you ignore an out-of-bounds violation because "no advantage" was gained? How about a travel? Should a coach tell his/her players to camp out in the lane until it is called?
To me, not calling it brings us closer to "The only rule is don't get caught" mentality that degrades the game. What possible reason is there for ignoring such a clear-cut rule? Our refs are calling it this year in the top level CYO divisions, and they should. As long as it is in the rule book, call the vioaltion (ok, let is slide for little kids).
|