Thread: Ariz/GB fumble
View Single Post
  #12 (permalink)  
Old Mon Jan 11, 2010, 05:37pm
aschramm aschramm is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by cmathews View Post
not sure of a ruling but it would most likely be declined anyway.
Correct. The only thing would have been if there were both a FM and illegal touching/batting called, the penalties would most likely offset and we'd still be at a 3rd down situation.

Only reason I bring this up, alot of Packer "fans" are all up in arms about the facemask non-call, but don't recognize that this illegal touching could have negated any gain from it anyway.
Reply With Quote