Wed Jan 06, 2010, 08:44am
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,847
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbyron
To my mind, this statement is not saying that hand checks are in some sense "automatic" independent of whether they create an illegal advantage.
Rather, it gives examples of how hand checking creates an illegal advantage and thus why hand checks need to be called more.
Helping officials recognize advantage/disadvantage is different from announcing "automatic" fouls, IMO. Officials and coaches should not interpret this kind of statement as endorsing an "automatic" foul independent of advantage/disadvantage.
|
Really? Which parts of this:
Quote:
Regardless of where it happens on the floor, when a player:
1) Continuously places a hand on the opposing player – it is a foul.
2) Places both hands on a player – it is a foul.
3) Continuously jabs a hand or forearm on an opponent – it is a foul.
|
are vague?
|