Quote:
Originally Posted by Camron Rust
I stated that I tought it was borderline in an earlier post...that I didn't think it was flagrant but believed before the call that a flagrant was a possible outcome of the review. Even though I didn't think it was flagrent, I wouldn't claim soneone was wrong who would call it flagrant.
The statement that I was responding to "If that's not flagrant, especially after seeing it on the replay, then I don't know what is."
is clearly too strong given that three very credibile officials didn't call it flagrant.
I didn't feel I needed to repeat my specific opinion. |
I made my comment in reference to your statement that went along with the officials on the game merely because they do a lot of games. I think that is weak logic. If you had an opinion of your own that was previously stated I would have no problem with that.
__________________
"Be more concerned with your character than your reputation, because your character is what you really are, while your reputation is merely what others think you are." -- John Wooden
|