Quote:
Originally Posted by icallfouls
If you have to argue your point, your case is not very strong.
Flagrant Foul definition:
...may be a personal or technical foul of a violent or savage nature, or a technical noncontact foul which displays unacceptable conduct. It may or may not be intentional. If personal, it involves, but is not limited to violent contact such as: striking, kicking, and kneeing. If technical, it involved deadball contact or noncontact at any time which is extreme or persistent, vulgar, or abusive conduct. Fighting is a flagrant act.
You can't get there in this case.
Additionally, nothing in 10.4 - 5 supports your case for flagrant.
|
Actually, you can get there in this case.
"...a technical noncontact foul which displays unacceptable conduct."
"If technical, it involved deadball contact or noncontact at any time which is...abusive conduct."
What constitutes abusive conduct cannot be decided by one person for everyone. What I find abusive, you may find acceptable. But that doesn't mean either of us is wrong.