Quote:
Originally Posted by jdw3018
This entire thread has spun a bit out of control, but it's an excellent read.
I had a recent example of a parent coming onto the court. Girls' V game. Girl goes down awkwardly when attempting to defend a shot (and gets called for a block in doing so) and obviously breaks her wrist/arm. Pretty nasty looking.
Beckon the coach immediately, move away. Mom comes out of the stands without being beckoned/without permission. She holds her daughter's hand while the coach and trainer attend to her and an administrator calls ahead to the hospital. Etc, etc.
Girl and mom leave with the trainer to head to the hospital.
We resume. No technicals.
Would a technical foul have made the game better? Not in a long shot. Was it deserved? In absolutely no way. Mom didn't interfere with the game, in fact, she calmed her daughter which likely helped get the game underway faster and with less emotional distress for others.
I can understand a desire to keep parents off the court in most cases. I can even see if someone wants game management to talk to fans/specific parents after an incident to let them know it would be appropriate to wait to be beckoned.
Asking GM to eject them and then issuing a technical foul is ridiculous. Absolutely ridiculous. And the T is completely without rules support. I'm shocked Nevada has taken a position so unsupported by the rules and in contradiction to the spirit of the rule referenced.
|
A very good reasoning to allow the parent down on the court is that yes they can calm the child & assist the attending medical personnel with the case history, it just depends on the severity of the injury.
In the situation with Derrick Roland, everyone else was on the other end of the court when the coach rushed out to his side. It was after the made attempt on the other side that play was stopped after everyone realized the seriousness of what was happening.