Quote:
Originally Posted by Kelvin green
One T. It seems clear to me based on the rule book and case plays that the intent is one TO for all the lineup stuff....
One Admin T... I had a game where the team added player after the start of the game (the assistant who was responsible messed up big time) We issued the admin T for adding one name. when it was discovered that another player had to be added three minutes later we added the name and moved on.
In a JV game I am going to figure out how not to call the T...
|
Kelvin,
I believe that it is the INTENT of the Rules to ONLY penalize ONE technical foul for all administrative line-up errors. At the same time, the Rules Book clearly indicates that ONLY ONE technical foul is to be assessed regardless how many 3-3-2 errors are made. In your case, ONLY ONE technical would be called for since they were BOTH associated with 3-3-2. In the OP -- a friend was the R -- BOTH 3-3-1 AND 3-3-2 were violated. Therefore, it would seem as though TWO TECHNICALS should be assessed in the first situation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref
THIS IS DIRECTED TO CMH:
Your situation would have been properly penalized by charging ONE team technical foul.
|
Nevada,
Are you saying only ONE TECHNICAL in BOTH violations in the case of the OP (team violates the 10 minute rule by not supplying starters AND is forced to add numerous JV players after the fact) since they, in essence, corrected BOTH items at the same time? Effectively saying that the team failed to provide the list of players with numbers and starters at the 10 minute mark.
To complicate matters a bit, after the coach added the six additional players and noted the starters at the five minute mark, my friend noticed TWO PLAYERS with the SAME NUMBER! Therefore, the coach made yet another change between the 10 minute mark and game start.
Is it reasonable to punish with a SINGLE technical for failing to provide the starters at the 10 minute mark (and complete list of players), and consider the subsequent changes in violation of 3-3-2 to be punished as part of violating 3-3-1 or do BOTH have to be punished separately?