Thread: foul
View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 28, 1999, 01:43pm
ken roberts ken roberts is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Posts: 83
Post

This is a false double foul, very similar to Case 4.19.8A. There is a player-control foul on A1 which means the basket is canceled. A1 shoots two free-throws for being fouled on the shot. After the second throw, Team B gets the ball OOB at the designated spot for the player-control foul.

would the call be different if A1 had not shot the ball but just landed on B2 still holding the ball

If you decide that A1's movements qualify for continuous motion, then the ruling is the same.

Otherwise, you'd just have a common foul on B1.
Reply With Quote