Quote:
Originally Posted by Back In The Saddle
Works for me. If the game resumed quickly and without incident, I think it was an acceptable way to handle that situation.
|
Let's say it's a close game, and you use this procedure, and as Team A is inbouding the ball, Coach B starts screaming that he called time out. Do you still think it's an acceptable way to handle it?
Thinking about it, it seems reasonable that you could go to Coach B at the next available opportunity and say "Coach, your first timeout request was invalid, since it came while Team A had the ball. By rule, it was an inadvertent whistle. And since you didn't call timeout while the ball was dead after I blew the whistle, I didn't grant you a timeout."
You would be within the rules to do this, but is it good game management, seeing as though Coach B is likely to blow his stack?