|
So I just looked in the Rules by Topic book and under Throw-Ins (topic 6)
Alternate-possession throw ins shall be from the out-of-bounds spot nearest to where the ball was located. An alternating-possesion throw-in shall result:
Double personal, double technical or simultaneous fouls occur and the point of interruption is such that neither team is in control and no goal, infraction, nor end of quarter/extra period is involved (6-4-3a-g;7-3).
Since during a throw in, the rule clearly states there is no team control, then why wouldnt we go to the arrow?
Is 'such that neither team is in control' and 'no team control' the same thing? I think thats where Im splitting hairs.
I am sorry to be a pain but I am a trainer with an association and I know most of the people are under the assumption we go to alternate-possesion, I need to be very clear in explaining the correct way. ~~
|