Quote:
Originally Posted by Theisey
It wasn't the snapper who went downfield... it was the player to his right who did. That player was covered in this odd formation.
|
Yes it was the snapper who went down field. He was standing with his shoulders parallel to the sideline and snapped it sideways a la flag football days.
The only explanation one can offer is the official thought the receiver would come down in-bounds without the contact.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Theisey
While I tend to agree in principle, its my understanding that when any such contact is in the direction a receiver is already moving and subsequently landing OOB is the result.. the pass is incomplete. That's how I would have ruled on this one.
|
The case book very clearly states this is to be an intepretation of the force-out rule. If the contact is in the direction the receiver is already moving, the receiver has to complete the catch with at least one foot in bounds. That was obviously not the case.