Quote:
Originally Posted by just another ref
So, my question now is, this was not a true blarge, but we did make conflicting preliminary signals, so do you hardliners say this had to be a double foul or not?
|
Could it be that the issue for you is definitional? Perhaps you're defining a "true blarge" as one that
really is both a block and PC foul. The applicable case doesn't define 'blarge' explicitly, but implicitly defines it in terms of what the officials call.
Perhaps your objection is that too many "notional blarges" end up being treated as "true blarges" by following the procedure of the case play.