Quote:
Originally Posted by Umpmazza
the key word you said in your paragraph was he did not touch F4. This was a good no call...
|
Your post suggests that you think contact is required for interference. That's incorrect: it's possible to hinder a player without touching him.
I thought that the umpire judged that the fielder was not hindered, despite the crappy throw to F6 covering.
If this happened on my field, I'm pretty sure it would be INT, especially given the crappy throw.