that makes more sense. I think my issue is that being stuck by a thrown ball in reference to 8.2.F.3 would be interference. Especially now with taking out 'intent' in interference.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oakla:
I think this is the problem:
Above you say "being struck by a thrown ball.... would be interference."
Thats NOT what the rule says. The rule says batter is out if he interferes with a thrown ball. He did not interfere, he was hit. Two different things.
|