Quote:
Originally Posted by bobbybanaduck
absolutely not. professional umpires do not conference on this type of thing. they either call it or they don't. and if they don't, it's not because they saw it was foul but aren't going to say anything, it's cuz they didn't think have it as foul. if ANY of the BUs had it hitting the bat and the ground, they would have immediately called it foul. therefore, the conference must have been about whatever bob saw on the ball when he inspected it.
|
Okay, fair enough. It just reinforces my point to others that it wasn't a foul ball then, because it never touched the bat.
They still got it wrong no matter which way you cut it.
By the way, he called it a foul tip originally, but the call was reversed to foul ball after he talked to the BUs. What else would they be discussing other than whether it hit the ground or not before going into F2's glove?