Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike L
who knew that "is touching" could be such a hard concept to grasp?
|
I think we agree that when the player touched anything OOB, he became OOB. Where we part ways is over how, or more importantly why, you presume he would regain a status of being inbounds, when he simply jumps up into the air while remaining outside (beyond) the sideline/endline?
If you accept that rules are made for some logical purpose that advances the playing of the game, you should be able to offer some logical basis for considering your interpretation as being rational. If you can't, you just have to question the interpretation.
We do not have to agree with the logic or rational for a rule, to be willing to enforce it, but there should be
SOME logic or rational involved to consider an interpretation enforceable.