View Single Post
  #20 (permalink)  
Old Tue Apr 21, 2009, 08:11am
mbyron mbyron is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 7,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob jenkins View Post
While where the ball "would have gone" is irrelevant to determining whether there was interference, it's exactly the criteria to use to determine the penalty for the interference.
Well, since in the OP, no interference was ruled, the point is moot. And in any case, the criterion is more where the runners would have ended up. I agree that where the ball would have gone is relevant to that question.
__________________
Cheers,
mb