Quote:
Originally Posted by LDUB
That is not correct. The violation is not for lifting the pivot foot. The violation is for starting a dribble after the pivot foot is lifted. Using your logic you could say lifting the pivot foot is a violation but is just isn't called until the pivot foot is returned to the floor. In both situations lifting the pivot foot is not a violation; what occurs after the pivot foot is lifted is the violation.
|
Then I guess the rule book is wrong, since that's were I quoted from.
The violation occurs because the pivot foot was moved outside prescribed limits.
Quote:
Originally Posted by eg-italy
It's already a violation. If you end the dribble with a foot in the frontcourt the ball has frontcourt status, because when the dribble has ended the "three point rule" doesn't hold any more; putting down the other foot in the backcourt is a violation.
|
So if a dribbler ends his dribble while straddling the division line, it's a violation in FEEBLE Rules? That's just stupid.
Quote:
|
I know what I'm talking about. I believe that case would be a violation also under Fed rules.
|
No, you don't and no it isn't. Under NFHS, when dribbling, a player is not in the FC until all three points are in the FC.
Me thinks you have your FC and BC status mixed up.