I think letters are generally okay. My impression is that more is being asked for. If the letter is to serve no other purpose than to make Adams aware of the perception others are getting, then great.
By aggressive action, I’m speaking specifically of calls to essentially have quotas where the race of the officials is largely predetermined.
I haven’t seen anyone suggest any official shouldn’t be given a chance. Maybe I missed it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRutledge
This is why we cannot have these discussions because if you even mention any issue of race, people come running to defend things they know nothing about. I am not asking for you to accept what Rose is saying (and we did not hear him talk about this topic at all BTW), but I find it interesting that people defend the current system without knowing the parties involved. You can accept anything; I find it interesting that you are quick to defend too.  |
I'm not defending anything. I'm asking questions. If we're going to have an honest discussion about race issues, it's going to have to start with a bunch of questions.
I'll admit Rose's opinion carries some weight due to his position.