Quote:
Originally posted by KWH
BBR-
You have made this claim before regarding NC and FL.
Can you provide and written documentaion such as a website to support this deviation from NFHS rules.
While I believe states such as Oregon and Washington modify the tie-breaker to be first and ten on the 25, I find it had to believe that "carry over" timeouts would be modified.
Please point me in the direction of your source. As an instructer of NFHS rules I am curious where you are getting you information.
Thank you
|
I don't need to make a "claim." I post, based on the knowledge, material, and experience that I have obtained.
I have an email that was sent to all booking agents in NC, from Dick Knox, Deputy Executive Director of the NCHSAA, explaining the procedure. I have attended state rules clinics and heard Mr. Knox explain this during the clinic.
With regards to Florida, I have communicated with officials in that state and have read responses on the McGriff Football Discussion Board regarding this procedure. They tell me that their ruling is the same as the one we use. I have no reason to not believe them, even if you do find it "had" to believe.
There's no reason that a state can't have this TO ruling. It's no different that starting 1st and 10 from the 25. It's the state association's option. Have you considered that perhaps the NCHSAA or FHSAA want to limit the number of TOs available to a team in OT?