Investigating further...
Found this article from the
LA Times
While the author does get in the normal cheap shots on the officials, he does put the onerous rightfully on Floyd.
Watching the interview, I'm wondering what game was he watching? He's basing his whole tirade on the fact that McCall signaled a blocked and an 'and 1'. I guess that's why he went after him and not the Lead. I've watched the play over and over again, and it's a textbook way to AVOID a blarge. At no time am I seeing anything resembling a "block and count it" signal. What am I missing here?