On the 2008 Interpretations document, page 14, it talks about backcourt violations. Read example 1. A3 jumps from his FC, intercepts a B pass and lands in A's BC. Ruling is no violation. There is a case for this being a higher probability of a violation than knocking the ball away in the FC and then going to get it in the BC.
It simply comes down to did A have TC in their FC?
__________________
Pope Francis
|