Quote:
Originally Posted by OHBBREF
So because the NFHS doesn't have a ruling on this play, the intent of the rule is different?
|
Exactly! If NFHS wanted to adopt the same ruling, it would be in the case book, right? So they must mean something else by the rule.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OHBBREF
So where would this interpretation deviate from that intent?
and If I am so wrong show me then;
What then is the intent of the NFHS rule?
|
I read the intention right out of the rule: if the leg intentionally strikes the ball, then it's a kick. Holding the ball between the legs does not meet that definition.