[TXMike]

Go back again Inspector Clouseau. My initial comments on this "boycott" had nothing to do with the article and were posted before the article came out. In fact, I posted similar comments on another board when the rest of us in the world were first clued into this situation last week. But my subsequent comments were after I viewed the article. All the article did was make me feel even stronger about my position.

If you cannot read the article and take away from it that the tape was inconclusive then you are truly not being an impartial observer. When the NFL looks at a tape and says they can't see enough to over rule a call, they are saying the tape is inconclusive. The way I read this article, the tape inconclusive. It does not matter if the camera angle is bad, or the videographer was shaking, or what the reason was. The bottom line is the tape is inconclusive.