Fri Dec 19, 2008, 10:52am
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 15,003
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.
NevadaRef:
B1's dead ball foul already meets the definition of a TF. The only thing the officials must decide is if it is intentional or flagrant or neither.
The POI reference is if the TF is neither intetional nor flagrant, i.e., instead of a dead ball contact foul B1 decides to yell at you in an unsportsmanlike conduc manner such: "Are you blind! How could you call a held ball. He fouled me." I agree with you that in the original situation it has to be either an intentional of flagrant foul. Of course in NFHS and NCAA Women's an intentional TF really doesn't exist anymore because of the penalties are the same as an TF that is neither intentional or flagrant.
MTD, Sr.
|
Ok, I agree. You confused me by considering a possible act that wasn't germane to the situation without making your thinking clear.
This was my 8,000th post!
Last edited by Nevadaref; Fri Dec 19, 2008 at 11:20am.
Reason: To note my 8,000th post
|