[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Nevadaref

With no technical foul, right?
I can't see how B1 could be charged with anything other than an intentional technical or a flagrant technical because this was a contact situation during a dead ball.
I find your reference to the POI confusing. There is no POI unless a T is called.

NevadaRef:

B1's dead ball foul already meets the definition of a TF. The only thing the officials must decide is if it is intentional or flagrant or neither.


The POI reference is if the TF is neither intetional nor flagrant, i.e., instead of a dead ball contact foul B1 decides to yell at you in an unsportsmanlike conduc manner such: "Are you blind! How could you call a held ball. He fouled me." I agree with you that in the original situation it has to be either an intentional of flagrant foul. Of course in NFHS and NCAA Women's an intentional TF really doesn't exist anymore because of the penalties are the same as an TF that is neither intentional or flagrant.

MTD, Sr.