Quote:
Originally Posted by waltjp
I didn't think there was enough there to show that the ball was in the end zone but I will concede that it was very close. The cause of my confusion was the explanation given by Coleman and his lack of stating that he concluded that the ball had broken the plane while in player possession.
|
I agree with the first sentence. I knew the rule, so I guess I didn't pay much attention to the explanation.
I don't like the precedent that this play sets for what counts as "indisputable visual evidence."