[Freddy]

Thank you for your clarifications in this thread! I just had an "ah-ha" moment, based on the responses above.
Seems the most distinctive thing about a false double foul is "what happens next". After reporting, the play is resumed by whatever follows after the penalty for each foul is administered according to order in which they each occured. Whereas, after a double foul, the play is resumed, after reporting the fouls, at the point of interruption.
Seems that "what happens next" is the most important thing about disguishing between a double foul and a false double foul. Is that an accurate conclusion?