View Single Post
  #14 (permalink)  
Old Wed Dec 03, 2008, 08:47am
Scrapper1 Scrapper1 is offline
Lighten up, Francis.
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,679
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nevadaref View Post
His use of the word "over" is synonymous with the use of the word "ends."
I agree that's what he meant. But the rulebook never talks (to my knowledge) of a throw-in being "over", so that -- to me -- was kind of ambiguous. It could mean:

1) the throw-in ends, in the rulebook sense; or
2) a throw-in pass was touched legally.

I just wanted to clarify that the arrow can switch without #2 ever happening.

Quote:
BTW could you please give me an instance in which the throw-in does not occur, yet the arrow switches?
When the throw-in team violates.

I understand that the throw-in does happen, in the rulebook sense. But there was no throw-in pass. That's the only point I was trying -- unsuccessfully -- to make.
Reply With Quote