Quote:
Originally Posted by youngump
A foul fly ball comes to mind, but if you have interference with a foul fly ball you don't immediately call the ball foul. You call it dead for interference and call it foul by implication. You don't say just because it's foul, I have no interference..
|
You cannot have a foul, fly ball though the definition makes that reference A fly ball does not meet the definition of a foul ball.
If there is INT on a fly ball over foul territory, the ball IS dead and declared foul by rule.
Quote:
|
Now, I'm not sure I remember the foul interference rule. If I had my book I'd look this up, but what do you do with the batter there? Interference by R1 at 3rd with a foul fly ball results in R1 being out, no? And if so, then B2 now has an extra strike. Whereas interference with R1 at 3rd on a fair fly ball results in the B2 becoming R2.
|
The batter is also ruled out. Rule 8.7.J.1 w/NOTE and EXCEPTION