Quote:
Originally Posted by CajunNewBlue
Well then my vote goes to HTBT.... coz the OP doesn't give me the detail i need.  |
Maybe.
Maybe not.
The OP tells you the catcher had a play. It tells you that as the catcher came up
trying to make a throw, the batter moved in a manner which caused contact which is active and hindering.
Intent is irrelevent.
If I'm a UIC and a coach protested the umpire's ruling, given this information, I would probably rule this as INT. Remove the fact that there was definitely a play, and I go to "no call". That's the bad part about being a UIC. You are only given a scenario and need to make a decision based solely on that. If you actually saw the play, you are a lucky UIC.