Quote:
Originally Posted by wadeintothem
As they should, the defender doesnt have the freakin ball.
I feel a "its for the children..." coming on...
|
Actually, not at all though it could apply. This is nothing new as it was once a "Henry said" rule which was supported by a case play.
BTW, "obstruction" is not Klingon for "free shot".
But I'm tired of talking to the wall. If this change doesn't pass, just remember the next time the tying run scores in the bottom of the 13th with 2 outs that if she wipes out the catcher with the ball in the outfield, you may be going to the 15th.