Foot OOB = not LGP
Interesting point . . . jdw says, "B1 is entitled to his position on the floor regardless of whether he's touching OOB."
Point of order here: 4-23-1 says: "Every player is entitled to a spot ON THE PLAYING COURT . . ." 4-23-3a says that a legal guarding position consists of "inbound status."
Therefore, is it not correct that B1 is not entitled to his illegal guarding position because he is committing a violation by having a foot OOB?
|