View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old Thu Oct 16, 2008, 01:06am
jjrye22 jjrye22 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 204
Refbuz - I'm not sure why you have called this shift example as an illegal formation.
The shift has made #17 inelligible, and #47 stays inelligible, but as long as he stays on the line he is still just a lineman.
I don't remember anything about the last man on the line having a requirement to be an elligible receiver as your post implies.

Whould you really flag this at the snap as illegal formation? Or just keep an eye on #47 since he was inelligible by rule even if not by position?

Just want to get full clarification.
Reply With Quote