[Mark T. DeNucci, Sr.]

Originally Posted by Scrapper1

No way, no bet. But where was it last year? And what is the rationale blah blah blah?

Scrapper1:

It is an old interpretation that was made when the rule was first adopted. I can't remember how many years ago that was. Just because the interpretation is currently not in the Casebook does not mean the interpretation ceases to exist or be valid. Tony and I both remember the interpretation because we are both old geezers (at least I am an old geezer) who have been officiating and students of the rules for years and years and years. Show Tony some R E S P E C T (Find out what it means to me, ).

MTD, Sr.