View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old Fri Sep 19, 2008, 03:09pm
Mike L Mike L is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 566
No it wouldn't. It's an argument for enforcing the penalty as per the current rule set. It's a live ball foul by the offense behind the basic spot. I have no problem eliminating the "philosphy" of only calling penalties at the point of attack/effect the play when an egrigious safety related foul like this happens. Today is not the football of yore when it was mayhem on the field. What if the next hit causes serious injury because someone decides risking only the PAT is worth payback?
Reply With Quote