Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Patton
Is that what you were doing when you initially refered to him as an "idiot"? You were the one that was incorrect on the rule, not him.  |
That was a thought and observation. I didn’t call him an idiot. It also is a recap of what happened. A thought popping into my head during an exchange in which he was acting idiotic. I would like to see some evidence of me being incorrect on the rule outside of “12 men on the field” because that obviously is the justification of misapplying participation. Perhaps look at the other 3 sentences each in both rules rather than ignore them.