Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dakota
In fact, I predicted his exact argument in a commentary I wrote about the removal of "intent" at the time the change was made. Here it is, again,...
|
Which was my stance when I spoke against the change at every committee meeting I could attend in Colorado Springs. This was such an intriging topic among umpires, it was being discussed at length by a few of us in the hotel lobby, were interupted by a fire alarm and the discussion continued in the parking lot.
I understood their explanations, but saw no reason to remove what they considered extraneous information since it actually provided more precise information in rules where, as we are still experiencing, some umpires need additional guidance.