View Single Post
  #10 (permalink)  
Old Sun Jul 20, 2008, 09:25pm
SanDiegoSteve SanDiegoSteve is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Lakeside, California
Posts: 6,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fritz
Yeah, we are all in agreement that it wasn't a foul tip because in this case, it didn't go directly to his mitt. And I noted the "not a catch if it is a rebound" in the rules as well Tim, but assumed that this applied only to determining a caught foul tip since that is the reference the language is under.
Not a catch means not a catch. It means it becomes an uncaught foul. The part of Tim's post that is in bold explains it for any part of the definition of a catch.
__________________
Matthew 15:14, 1 Corinthians 1:23-25
Reply With Quote