Sun Aug 04, 2002, 09:27pm
|
|
Official Forum Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 1999
Posts: 149
|
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mark Dexter
Quote:
Originally posted by Ralph Stubenthal
Mark, check rule 4-19-4. It explains that a flagrant foul "may or may not be intentional."
|
To borrow from one of the posts on the last thread, replace "intentional" in that phrase with "deliberate."
Quote:
|
We naturally tossed the player. We didn't use any verbage but it was obviously intentional and flagrant.
|
Yes, it qualifies as either, but you can only assess one - otherwise, the player would attempt 4(6) free throws.
Mark, that ain't so. The word flagrant simply means he gets tossed. A flagrant technical means ejection and 2 shots, ball back at division line. A flagrant intentional means ejection, 2 or 3 shots, and ball back at point of foul.
Quote:
As far as the above thread goes, as I understand the rule, whenever you have an intentional foul on a shooter, if the shot was not good, then the 2 or in this case 3 shots would be taken and then they get the ball back. In other words, you don't shoot the normal 2 shots for the intentional. If the basket had been good, then the shooter would get 2 shots and the ball back for an intentional foul. So, in the above situation, if you called the foul on the shooter an intentional instead of a technical, he would get his 3 shots rather than just get the 2 for the tech.
|
Actually, by #5 of the summary of penalties, the player gets 3 shots for any foul against him during a missed 3pt try/tap.
|
[Edited by Ralph Stubenthal on Aug 4th, 2002 at 09:30 PM]
|