View Single Post
  #9 (permalink)  
Old Fri Aug 02, 2002, 02:48pm
112448 112448 is offline
Official Forum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 101
I agree with most everyone that i would not have a foul at all in the first situation, even if the ball did not go in, but i would have one in the second situation, even if the ball did go in.

my feeling is that contact occurring from behind or from the side on a fastbreak can potentially become very ugly and to have a no-call when a player flails to the ground can send a VERY bad message.

bottom line - if a player's speed, quickness, or balance is impacted by illegal contact we need to have a foul, if it's not, we might be able to pass.

jake
Reply With Quote